Understanding the machine gets you in the door. Understanding the business case closes the deal. This module covers ROI models for each vertical, the competitive landscape, and the scientific backing that gives buyers the confidence to sign.
The AURUM ONE is a CHF 80,000 capital investment. Your job is never to defend the price — it's to make the ROI undeniable. Every vertical has a different ROI story. Know them all.
Note: AURUM studios in Switzerland charge CHF 250/month for 2 sessions/week. These rates are validated by market experience. Adjust for local pricing in your territory.
Corporations invest in employee wellness through two lenses: benefit packages and productivity ROI. Frame the AURUM ONE both ways.
The economic case here is indirect but powerful — it's about cost avoidance, not revenue generation.
Additionally: premium senior living facilities in Switzerland (Tertianum, Bellevue Residenz, Zumipark) can justify a CHF 500+/month premium on room rates by offering certified strength training as an amenity — a meaningful revenue uplift on 60–80 residents.
Each vertical has a different decision-maker, a different pain point, and a different ROI story. Adapt your pitch accordingly.
Decision-maker: Clinical Director, Head Physiotherapist, Medical Director
Pain points: Patient outcomes need to be documented and measurable. Staff time is limited. Insurance billing requires certified equipment. Patients need safe, supervised-optional training.
Your pitch angle: "The AURUM ONE generates objective outcome data per session — exactly what you need for insurance reporting, patient progress documentation, and clinical audit. It's CE-certified and designed for medical settings."
Decision-maker: HR Director, Chief People Officer, CFO (for large investments)
Pain points: Employee sick days, talent attraction/retention, duty of care. Wellness budgets exist but need ROI justification. Space constraints in office environments.
Your pitch angle: "6 minutes, no shower required, fits in a meeting room. The AURUM ONE gives your team access to the most time-efficient strength training available — with data to prove it's working."
Decision-maker: Facility Director, Wellness Coordinator, Medical Director
Pain points: Fall risk and associated hospitalization costs. Regulatory pressure to demonstrate resident health outcomes. Competitive differentiation (premium facilities compete on wellness). Staff have limited time for individual fitness supervision.
Your pitch angle: "Sarcopenia — muscle loss with age — is the primary driver of falls and loss of independence. The AURUM ONE reverses it in 6 minutes, twice a week. No staff supervision required during sessions."
Decision-maker: General Manager, Spa Director, Director of Guest Experience
Pain points: Every luxury hotel has a gym — differentiation is hard. Guests want results without spending 90 minutes in a gym. Revenue per square meter of wellness space is under pressure.
Your pitch angle: "You can be the only hotel in [city] that offers certified isokinetic strength training. In 6 minutes per session, your guests experience the equivalent of a 45-minute workout — and they have data to prove it."
Decision-maker: Base Commander, Fitness Officer, Procurement Officer
Pain points: Physical readiness maintenance with minimal facility time. Return-to-duty rehabilitation after injury. Objective fitness measurement for compliance reporting.
Your pitch angle: "The AURUM ONE delivers a complete full-body strength session in 6 minutes — ideal for time-constrained operational units. Its rehabilitation protocols support faster return-to-duty after musculoskeletal injury."
AURUM's efficacy isn't just a claim — it's backed by decades of isokinetic training research. Here are the studies and data points to use in conversations with clinicians, procurement officers, and skeptical CFOs.
| Finding | Source | Relevant Vertical |
|---|---|---|
| Isokinetic training produces 40% greater muscle activation vs. isotonic | Hislop & Perrine (foundational isokinetic research) | All |
| HIT (1 set to failure) equally effective as 3 sets for strength gains in trained individuals | Steele et al., 2025 — Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | Corporate, Studio |
| Eccentric-focused training (2:1 ratio) produces superior hypertrophy vs. concentric-only | Roig et al., 2009 — British Journal of Sports Medicine | All |
| Resistance training reduces fall risk in older adults by 30–45% | Sherrington et al., 2024 — Cochrane Review update | Retirement Homes, Rehab |
| Muscle loss (sarcopenia) begins at age 35 at ~1% per year, accelerates post-50 | Frontera et al., 2024 — Journal of Gerontology | Retirement Homes, Rehab |
| Progressive resistance training reverses sarcopenia markers in adults 60–80+ | Peterson et al. meta-analysis — American Journal of Medicine | Retirement Homes, Rehab |
| Short-duration high-intensity training (<10 min) activates equivalent cardiovascular adaptations as longer moderate training | Gibala et al., 2014 — Journal of Physiology (extended in 2024 follow-up) | Corporate, Hotel |
| Workplace wellness programs return CHF/EUR 3 per CHF/EUR 1 invested | Baicker et al., Harvard Business Review — Health Affairs | Corporate |
| Each prevented fall saves EUR 15,000–30,000 in direct hospitalization and rehabilitation costs | CDC / Swiss Federal Office of Public Health estimates (2024) | Retirement Homes |
| Resistance training improves cognitive function and depression outcomes in clinical populations | Gordon et al., 2025 — Journal of Psychiatric Research | Rehab, Senior Living |
ARX (the closest competitor, US-based) has published performance data that supports the isokinetic category. This actually helps AURUM — any serious prospect who researches adaptive resistance training will find ARX research, which validates the category. Your advantage over ARX: European availability, CE certification, and lower price.
Notes are saved locally in your browser.